Author Topic: Maurice Cotterell is stark, raving, bonkers  (Read 864 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

expat

  • Activity:
    6.8%
Maurice Cotterell is stark, raving, bonkers
« on: February 05, 2012, 12:21:22 PM »
Surprising that we don't already have a "Cotterell is mad" thread. Well we do now.

Light intensity IS NOT MEASURED IN VOLTS.
Love is not a factor in the equation E = mC2.

That's just for starters.


stevesh

  • Activity:
    21.6%
Re: Maurice Cotterell is stark, raving, bonkers
« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2012, 02:48:27 PM »

Love is not a factor in the equation E = mC2.

But if Einstein had had access to modern computers it might have been !

Cotterell has always struck me as one of those 'geniuses' who formulated some whack-a-doo theories as a teenager and spends rest of his life railing against the rest of us for not recognizing his brilliance. See also David Wilcock.

Morgus

  • Activity:
    50.4%
Re: Maurice Cotterell is stark, raving, bonkers
« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2012, 06:03:36 PM »
He can sure ramble on and the host doesn't have to say a word like with John Wells last night.
Ian Punnett however couldn't stand that, he wanted to get a word in edgewise every minute or so and Maurice wouldn't let him, so Ian dumped him within an hour when he was a guest with him last year...

b_dubb

  • Activity:
    56%
Re: Maurice Cotterell is stark, raving, bonkers
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2012, 07:34:04 PM »
I believe I may have expressed a similar sentiment as Expat in another thread. Maurice bounces back and forth, making connections between unrelated ideas. I'd say he could stand to have some quality time with a shrink

Scully

  • Activity:
    4%
Re: Maurice Cotterell is stark, raving, bonkers
« Reply #4 on: February 06, 2012, 12:15:50 AM »
I also searched for an existing thread such as this, Expat.  Couldn't believe there wasn't one, but was too tired to start one myself last night.  Right on!  The guy is in absolute orbit!

By the way, though, Morgus, John B. did get at least one word in edgewise last night.  It was "Excellent!"  Then he cut to a break.   ::)

MRNicholas

  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Maurice Cotterell is stark, raving, bonkers
« Reply #5 on: February 06, 2012, 05:37:14 PM »
Couldn't help but think it's just plain nasty to regard everyone and everything in the physical universe as being in hell (and what, are they evil too? huh? WTF?). You see a young happy couple with their kids smiling and having fun, loving each other and life on a beautiful, sunny day. The H word doesn't pop into your head, unless perhaps you're not quite correct, mentally, and dare I say -- spiritually. A clever man? I guess so but there are plenty of TOEs out there that are equally brilliant; personally I found him to be disrespectful of life not to mention fear-inducing.

If Mr. Cotterell finds the entire concepts/so-called facts he espouses 'exciting', good for him, but I don't recall his explanation of what being with God is supposed to exactly (or even approximately) feel like, how it's experienced (I'm assuming ecstatic...it would need to be at least this for this beautiful, interesting and fascinating world and its myriad of experiences to pale so in comparison). Just what would existence entail for souls in this realm?

...and as regards souls ending up burning in hell in the heat of the sun - what, would they have full, physical bodies with skin and a nervous system to allow them to experience the full horror of this environment. Obviously there will be some approximation he would undoubtedly present, for our consideration, between ourselves and the forms which inhabit this *hot* existence. Just smacks of pure, refined bollocks to me.

His manner seemed slightly manic to me, his vocabulary a little childish in his over-simplification of other physicists work. He was a bit too liberal with the old tar and brush I think; annoying, disrespectful, irritating. I aint' the most eloquent or intelligent of peeps myself but have a pretty good BS detector, if I do say so myself.

But good on him for his passion and devoting his life to researching the nature of existence, it all adds to the variety of this great big world of ours. La la la...

 ::)
« Last Edit: February 06, 2012, 05:45:11 PM by MRNicholas »

Citizen Space

  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Maurice Cotterell is stark, raving, GENIUS - I mean bonkers
« Reply #6 on: February 07, 2012, 08:10:25 PM »
Here's what I typed up - that night I think - mostly:
Maurice Cotterell says God wants to grow? I think that's a little anthropo-psycho (ideologically anthropic). He did have me for awhile with it, but no; my opinion is that God is so far out there that a googleplex of geniuses couldn't imagine Him.

Besides if God is positively-charged, and the created universe is negatively-charged, they both would naturally attract the other immediately.

Was that really the guy that Ian threw off last year? (I wish I wouldv'e known that this time.) I remember that. Kudos for Ian. (It should be a give-and-take show.)

thefamilyghost

  • Activity:
    6%
Re: Maurice Cotterell is stark, raving, bonkers
« Reply #7 on: February 08, 2012, 12:40:19 AM »
Waiting for astroguy's review of that show and guest 8)

thefamilyghost

  • Activity:
    6%
Re: Maurice Cotterell is stark, raving, bonkers
« Reply #8 on: February 08, 2012, 12:45:25 AM »
'relativity is all nonsense, anyways'

MRNicholas

  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Maurice Cotterell is stark, raving, bonkers
« Reply #9 on: February 08, 2012, 03:50:09 AM »
Quote
my opinion is that God is so far out there that a googleplex of geniuses couldn't imagine Him.

Very well said.

Agent : Orange

  • Activity:
    9.2%
Re: Maurice Cotterell is stark, raving, bonkers
« Reply #10 on: February 12, 2012, 08:44:34 AM »
'relativity is all nonsense, anyways'
Cotterell said this on the radio? Wow.

b_dubb

  • Activity:
    56%
Re: Maurice Cotterell is stark, raving, bonkers
« Reply #11 on: February 12, 2012, 06:42:42 PM »
just downloaded a C2C show with Maurice being interviewed by Knapp.  "Corkscrew radiation waves"?? I'm college educated and a physics enthusiast.  Would someone explain what is meant by "corkscrew style radiation"?

Agent : Orange

  • Activity:
    9.2%
Re: Maurice Cotterell is stark, raving, bonkers
« Reply #12 on: February 12, 2012, 07:55:11 PM »
just downloaded a C2C show with Maurice being interviewed by Knapp.  "Corkscrew radiation waves"?? I'm college educated and a physics enthusiast.  Would someone explain what is meant by "corkscrew style radiation"?

Sounds like cro-magnon trying to describe circular polarization?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_polarization

astroguy

  • Activity:
    8%
Re: Maurice Cotterell is stark, raving, bonkers
« Reply #13 on: February 13, 2012, 12:33:13 AM »
Waiting for astroguy's review of that show and guest 8)

I have wanted to do a LOOOOONG blog post on him ever since I first heard him back in 2008 when he was talking about how King Tut = Jesus = Buddah and how when you hate, you kill a part of the God voltage and how phasers really exist.  He's gotten crazier and crazier each time I hear him, and I actually got really annoyed with Wells' complete lack of ANY form of questioning or even taking calls.  It should've just been the Maurice Cotterell 4-Hour Talk-a-Thon.

Anyway, getting into his crap would take more time than I have right now to devote to it.  I'd need to just pick a tiny topic - much like just picking a tiny part of Hoagland's crap - and pick it apart.  Addressing the whole thing is like trying to debunk Alex Jones in 1000 words or less.

b_dubb

  • Activity:
    56%
Re: Maurice Cotterell is stark, raving, bonkers
« Reply #14 on: February 13, 2012, 03:28:58 PM »
Sounds like cro-magnon trying to describe circular polarization?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_polarization
magnetism is not the same as gravity.  gravity is a weak force.  magnetism is a strong force.  i know this because i saw the physicist who taught my 300 level astronomy class in college demonstrate how a small magnet could defeat Earth's gravitational pull on a paperclip. 


i keep hearing people mention electromagnetism when talking about anti-gravity methods (theorhetical).  am i the only person sitting there shaking my head?




Agent : Orange

  • Activity:
    9.2%
Re: Maurice Cotterell is stark, raving, bonkers
« Reply #15 on: February 13, 2012, 04:52:54 PM »
magnetism is not the same as gravity.  gravity is a weak force.  magnetism is a strong force.  i know this because i saw the physicist who taught my 300 level astronomy class in college demonstrate how a small magnet could defeat Earth's gravitational pull on a paperclip. 
Was "corkscrew style radiation" in regard to gravity in some way? I don't know what Cotterell was talking about, but "corkscrew style radiation" seemed like maybe he was taking a shot at circular polarization of EM radiation.

i keep hearing people mention electromagnetism when talking about anti-gravity methods (theorhetical).  am i the only person sitting there shaking my head?
No, you're not.

But one of the reasons why many people may be confused is due to the similarity between weak field gravity from GR and Maxwell's equations (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitomagnetism) which has absolutely nothing to do with using EM effects to alter gravitational fields.

Citizen5510

  • Activity:
    0%
Re: Maurice Cotterell is stark, raving, bonkers
« Reply #16 on: February 13, 2012, 06:03:56 PM »
This guy seemed like he was taking hits off the crack pipe every 10 mins to me. He talked a mile a minute and made no sense..he's a snake oil salesman IMHO and John B. just sat in his chair with his mike up his ass and acted like he was so "amazed" at his nonsensical jibber jabber I wanted to throw up..wow that sounds kinda mean but hey truth hurts Cit

themudking

  • Activity:
    1.6%
Re: Maurice Cotterell is stark, raving, bonkers
« Reply #17 on: February 13, 2012, 06:15:26 PM »
Addressing the whole thing is like trying to debunk Alex Jones in 1000 words or less.


I think I've become smarter just reading these posts.


I can debunk Alex Jones in less than 4 words:  Bat-shit-crazy (or it could be one word if drawn out correctly)

b_dubb

  • Activity:
    56%
Re: Maurice Cotterell is stark, raving, bonkers
« Reply #18 on: February 13, 2012, 07:25:27 PM »
I have the Cottrel / Knapp show. Not sure how to get that to anyone who might want to give it a listen. You know ... to get specific on how completely wrong Maurice might be