The Forum > Coast to Coast AM Topics
disclosure
b_dubb:
i did a search and failed to find a thread with the same title. some were similar but years old. i'd like to stir the pot
i read a book a while back called "Everything You Know Is Wrong" which is a collection of essays published by the Disinformation media group. in the back of the book ... nestled in with a bunch of short pieces that weren't big enough to be essays but were too interesting not to be included ... there's a short bit about how the UN/International Community tried to outlaw the weaponization of space. they list a series of familiar and unfamiliar sounding weapons. plasma weapons. microwave weapons. nuclear weapons. then they kind of drop a bombshell towards the end: extra-terrestrial weapons. i must have read that paragraph a thousand times. they were basically quoting from the UN resolution at that point. so was this a slip up? unintentional disclosure? or was someone just ... thinking ahead?
is anyone else familar with this book? or the UN resolution attempting to prevent the weaponization of space?
b
EDIT //
further evidence that i should refer/re-read documents BEFORE posting
the legal document i mentioned is ... the Space Preservation Act of 2001 ( H.R. 2977 ) and was not a product of the UN but rather the US Congress. big difference. also ... the term 'extra-terrestrial' was used in conjunction with other words that suggest that the legal language may have been referring to weapon systems designed for use in different regions of the atmosphere or proximity to the planet.
more exactly ... the phrase appears like this ...
(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons and;
it's still a really interesting article. though ... probably not a slip up disclosure.
i'm an asshat. carry on.
UFO Geek:
DISCLOSURE: What exactly is it? Who would need to disclose, and disclose what? Please draft a memo for signature. Whose signature?
I wonder what the majority of people would want to hear, and who would they want to hear it from?
If there is ever disclosure, just think of all those who would suffer... no more books on disclosure, no more meetings on disclosure, no more discussions about disclosure. Well, maybe not that bad, because there would always be many who would not consider "The Disclosure", actually disclosure.
I've worked for the Feds for going on 36 years, and I've been fibbed to by many bosses, and bosses bosses, and bosses bosses bosses. And I work for the Feds. I don't think we will ever get REAL DISCLOSURE.
If you really crave disclosure, I would read one of the Richard Dolan books, like UFOs and the National Security State.
That should give you as much disclosure as you need, and just imagine all the government documents he hasn't reviewed.
73... Mike KG7UFO
M. Knight:
--- Quote from: b_dubb on January 19, 2011, 07:45:20 PM ---i did a search and failed to find a thread with the same title. some were similar but years old. i'd like to stir the pot
i read a book a while back called "Everything You Know Is Wrong" which is a collection of essays published by the Disinformation media group. in the back of the book ... nestled in with a bunch of short pieces that weren't big enough to be essays but were too interesting not to be included ... there's a short bit about how the UN/International Community tried to outlaw the weaponization of space. they list a series of familiar and unfamiliar sounding weapons. plasma weapons. microwave weapons. nuclear weapons. then they kind of drop a bombshell towards the end: extra-terrestrial weapons. i must have read that paragraph a thousand times. they were basically quoting from the UN resolution at that point. so was this a slip up? unintentional disclosure? or was someone just ... thinking ahead?
is anyone else familar with this book? or the UN resolution attempting to prevent the weaponization of space?
b
EDIT //
further evidence that i should refer/re-read documents BEFORE posting
the legal document i mentioned is ... the Space Preservation Act of 2001 ( H.R. 2977 ) and was not a product of the UN but rather the US Congress. big difference. also ... the term 'extra-terrestrial' was used in conjunction with other words that suggest that the legal language may have been referring to weapon systems designed for use in different regions of the atmosphere or proximity to the planet.
more exactly ... the phrase appears like this ...
(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons and;
it's still a really interesting article. though ... probably not a slip up disclosure.
i'm an asshat. carry on.
--- End quote ---
bwwhahahhaahaha!
Lena:
Knowledge is power, so there will NEVER be disclosure about anything the elite can use to increase THEIR power.
By the way, your list of weapons reminded me of this clip:
George Carlin - We Like War
anagrammy:
Let's be honest here. If there were disclosure Richard Hoagland style, we would be suspicious. Our collective eyes would narrow and we would immediately be posting, "Why now?" You're nodding, you know it's true. Someone would reply, "It's a smokescreen to hide what's going on in the Middle East, where the sky is falling." and someone else would say, "We aren't buying it--the video is old, look at the CD player/alarm clock on the credenza behind the President and the Aliens."
"Yeah, and I saw that face ripping act already on V. I'ts a set up."
Anagrammy
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version