Author Topic: JC  (Read 1102 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Paper*Boy

  • Activity:
    28.8%
JC
« on: August 10, 2009, 08:27:21 PM »
Anyone hear JC call in to Ian last night?

It was always kinda funny (for about 18 seconds) when JC would ambush Art Bell on unscreened open lines, but I never really liked those conversation/rants that much.

Ian kept mentioning JC would be up 'soon', then 'next' after the break, since he has callers screened.  Having JC waiting and knowing he is coming up 'next' just is not at all the same as having him suddenly 'on'. 

Ian seemed game, but a bit uncomfortable, probably felt he should take that call 'for the team - George being afraid of JC and all. 

Ian, if you read this, please don't feel you 'should' have JC on.  Really. 

But then I've never liked JC, and maybe I just don't get it.  I'm curious as to whether other folks like JC.  Just in small doses?  Just with Art?  Never would be too soon?


EvB

  • Activity:
    0%
Re: JC
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2009, 09:13:22 PM »
Did you hear JC's stifled laughter?  I did  ;D Ian did one of those "spit laughs" at something JC said - and JC was taken back for a couple of seconds. THAT was funny.

As for JC being "up soon" Ian said he was making JC hang on till last on the open call line. JC is pretty easy to deal with going into a break.  You can just hang up n him. 

I've been pretty sure that JC was a put-on for a long time - but if I hadn't - that call would have settled the deal for me.

Sophie

  • Activity:
    0%
Re: JC
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2009, 09:21:27 PM »
He didn't seem like he had his usual "boiling pits of sewage" rant to me either.

Supernormal

  • Activity:
    0%
Re: JC
« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2009, 02:12:42 AM »
A little bit goes a long way. That said, I wish that he would go after Steve Quayle tonight.

KnyeGuy

  • Activity:
    0%
Re: JC
« Reply #4 on: August 15, 2009, 07:18:27 AM »
Yup. The whole entertainment factor of JC has plummeted to zero. Screened calls SUCK, and trying to make JC appear as a random lunatic when call-screening is in effect is just a b s o l u t e bullshit.

JC [even] seems bored with the format of C2C since Noory took over. Hence he's lost his zest for inventing new words and  lines like "less book learnin', more book burnin'"
And I'm pretty sure that Noory actually thinks insultate is an actual verb... so to say the least, JC's tirades are lost on him anyways.

PW

  • Activity:
    0%
Re: JC
« Reply #5 on: August 15, 2009, 07:22:45 AM »
Yup. The whole entertainment factor of JC has plummeted to zero. Screened calls SUCK, and trying to make JC appear as a random lunatic when call-screening is in effect is just a b s o l u t e bullshit.

JC [even] seems bored with the format of C2C since Noory took over. Hence he's lost his zest for inventing new words and  lines like "less book learnin', more book burnin'"
And I'm pretty sure that Noory actually thinks insultate is an actual verb... so to say the least, JC's tirades are lost on him anyways.

Nooron never "gets" JC's entertainment value.  Nooron is an excellent example of what a one dimensional universe would be like.

M. Knight

  • Activity:
    32%
Re: JC
« Reply #6 on: December 18, 2009, 05:00:03 PM »
Yup. The whole entertainment factor of JC has plummeted to zero. Screened calls SUCK, and trying to make JC appear as a random lunatic when call-screening is in effect is just a b s o l u t e bullshit.

This is so correct, and indicative of the drivel that the show has become.  JC was like an "Anti-Bell" - an entertaining antagonist so to speak.  His convoluted rants contrasted the steady intellectualism of Art Bell.  That entertaining, dynamic interchange just cannot exist when JC comes up against the infinite convolution of George Noory.  They cancel each other out.